In a post on the Google blog on Monday, when the company's technical team discovered the bug in March, he decided to report the problem to users because they had not found anyone who was interested.
In the blog post, Google stated that its "Privacy and Privacy Office" decided that the company was not required to report the security issue. Google has analyzed "what kind of data is involved if we could identify users properly, if there are signs of abuse, and if a developer or user could do something." None of these limits were reached in this case, "wrote Ben Smith, vice president of technical Google.
Up to 438 applications may have access to vulnerabilities, but Google has indicated that there is no indication that any third parties are aware of the vulnerability and that there are no signs that user profiles have been hacked.
The event could be the subject of a further review, based on a note reminding managers in connection with the creation of Google's political and legal groups that have alerted Google to similar Facebook genes that occurred this year when public vulnerability was identified , was transmitted.
The decision to disable Google Plus was part of a comprehensive overview of the amount of user information shared with the outsourced developer. Google, an alphabetical device, also said it restricts the applications that can work with Gmail, the company's email service, and limits the amount of data that developers can access through Google's Android smartphone software.
No comments:
Post a Comment